> Hello. > > > Is useful expecially in Italy. Our Public Administrations use a lot of > rtf files for their workflow > > and we have a lot of problem with this orrible file format. :( > > Often the bug report doesn't contain the whiteboard tag or the > description is not so clear. > > so, a meta is useful for quickly identify and verify a new > interoperability problem. > > Yes, I am meeting this problem too. Working with rtf in LibreOffice is > painfull. If you believe that metabug helps developers - let it be. I > add some old bugs. We should not foget about them. >
Before opening a meta bug I suggest pinging the dev list (and particularly the rtf expert(s) and ask them if it will help at all. We have quite a few meta bugs that are literally never looked at. How would this be better than just putting "filter:rtf" on all of them? Would it do something extra? Best, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer [email protected]
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
