On 23/07/14 12:25, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded bibisect-43all.tar.xz and unpacked it. Now, the wiki page > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect (and common sense) > suggest that I should be able to "git pull" to get new builds, but the > wiki page does not list any git:// (or ssh:// or whatever) URLs I > could use to fetch/pull from. Only tarball download.
AFAIK the only bibisect repo that you can pull from is vmiklos' https://bitbucket.org/vmiklos/lo-daily the other ones tend to get updated on an irregular schedule, and you can only use zsync on them (at least the jlallement one) which doesn't work well in practice to reduce the size... > Also, the xz compression takes ~rather long to uncompress (the unpack > is clearly CPU-bound in the xz decompression process) and wins only > 0.016% (a bit less than 2MiB) over the uncompressed tar. I'd suggest > it is not worth the compression (or use a much faster algorithm than > xz)... thanks for providing some data to prove that given how well git repack works the extra compression is pointless. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
