jphilipz wrote > the duplicates link on the wiki page wouldnt be a beneficial resource to > point users to who had such issues, as it would require them to do alot > of reading, and the point of the wiki page is to provide summaries and > possible solutions.
Hi! A lot of reading - good, maybe the quality of reports would be better this way. Remember that MFRB page is good to select and add another "me too" comment and subscribe to CC list and as such indicate that the bugs should be first to fix (or vote for it in the future) . I hope that if you publish such wiki page then you will ask the people to be active in Bugzilla anyway. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-LibO-common-bugs-issues-tp4114035p4114182.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
