On 18/06/14 17:39, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joel Madero <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> ConfirmedRegression >>>> >>>> Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression. >>> why do we need this, given that we have a "regression" keyword? this is >>> a pointless alias... developers don't search for it, the ESC bug-stats >>> script doesn't know about it... fortunately currently only 2 bugs have it. >> Moving to not in use - agreed regression keyword is sufficient. > > AFAIK the only reason we use 'regression' in the keyword field instead > of the whiteboard is that FDO happens to have 'regression' set as a > keyword. To simplify our learning curve for QA, we should make a push > for consistency. (we can make a decision here after bugzilla > migration)
exactly, if we can finally add the keywords that we need then we can get rid of a lot of whiteboard entries and have bugzilla detect typos entered in the keywords field... _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
