Hi, On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:06:07AM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > So, to me personally, this practice of "witch-hunting" (or > finger-pointing) really bogs me down, especially I receive such notice > hundreds of times during a typical development cycle.
There is no witch-hunting in this and lets please not put it in there by escalating to such vocabulary. The simple fact is that the author of a change is the one most obvious person to shed light on the issue. Having this info fast and at the right place is essential to have a good view on the state of the release and keeping everything smooth on track for train-based release schedule. Of course, if there are concrete proposals on how to improve interaction between triagers and developers that work for everyone, those are most welcome! Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
