jmadero wrote > The € 3000 is for the migration itself not for administering it once it > is setup.
Hi! OMG. Anyway who will administer the own instance? I am asking because every custom change in Bugzilla will have to be done pretty much manually whether it is a change in the perl code (any perl coder on stand-by?), template toolkit files (any tt magician on stand-by?) , database or Bugzilla itself (any Bugzilla experienced admin on stand-by?). Of course those changes have to be tested before landing on production, the best in an automatic way using customized Bugzilla's QA selenium tests (any Selenium expert on stand-by?). So I hope 'own Bugzilla' project is not only about cloning the current FDO instance, deleting unneeded bugs in both and taking € 3000 for it... The future of this bug tracker (and implementing any changes) depends on having a contractor/freelancer or dedicated volunteers. Having another update on yet another list is IMHO last thing needed as there are already older wishlists: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/ImprovingBugzilla https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/How_to_Improve_Bugzilla https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/OwnBugzilla Best regards. P.S. The next version of Bugzilla (5.0), with its new features, is already testable at https://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-tip/. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-QA-Bug-Tracker-Feature-Request-tp4101889p4102067.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
