On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Jean Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Norbert Thiebaud <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jean Weber <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> I used the regular (32-bit) build, which the download page suggested, >>> and which I have always used. Should I be using the 64-bit build? I'll >>> try that today. >> >> both should work for 10.9... I would just like a confirmation that the >> 64 bits build works (which I think it does... as the problem seems to >> be tied to the signing of the Python Framework.. which is not >> delivered in the 64 bits build (unnecessary since the target 10.8+ >> already have a suitable system python) >> >> Norbert > > > 64-bit Mac version opened for me as it should.
Good news... I'm uploading a 'fixed' version to the pre-release section... FYI I needed to add this https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/7152/ to make it work cloph, as this is just a packaging/signing problem.. it is prolly not worth bothering with a re-spin of the source tarball... Norbert _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
