Hi Andras
Andras Timar-3 wrote > The built-in English grammar checker (Lightproof) does not know many > rules. It does not mean, that "B) grammar check is not usable at all". > It works as designed. I'm sorry but I couldn't avoid laughing at this... Works as designed? Yes, this is true. It is indeed *usable* but USELESS. Sorry for picking the wrong word. >From a functionality point of view this is the same as saying that "LO does NOT provide a Grammar checker for en_US. You should get an Extension if you require that Extra feature". This means that the menu option IS misleading. I am aware that the Language tools are not developed by TDF but then to be perfectly honest TDF should not gloat that "Writer has all the features you need from a modern, full-featured word processing and desktop publishing tool" (I had never noticed the DTP part... LOL) A Grammar checker is a MAJOR feature of a word processor. Again, playing with words, it is indeed *included* except that it is useless... Of course this is not a TDF/LO only problem. Still it is misleading and disappointing... Oh, and Language Tool didn't find any errors on that sentence... Just my 2 cents... -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Grammar-check-does-not-work-when-there-is-no-spellcheck-in-a-document-tp4087188p4087223.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
