Dnia 2013-10-25, o godz. 21:39:15 "bjoern" <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> Yes, for bibisecting, currently "Bjoern 4.0" and "Bjoern 2013-10-12" > are the way to go. The Jean archive might be helpful once the Bjoern > 2013-10-12 repo grows too old -- OTOH hopefully, by then we have > bibisect-from-dailies in place. Thanks for confirming my assumptions. Personally, I think it would be better to update wiki with info we have and not wait for bibisect-from-dailies to appear. I mean - it might be available in few days, it might be available in few months. We will just update wiki when it will be available, and in the meantime provide instructions for most recent archives we have. > > If anyone can update wiki page with information provided in this > > message, please do. > > Oh, please do yourself -- chinese whispers is a fun game, but its not > good for technical documentation. ;) > > If you dont want that, please at least add a link to this Mail on > some archive there, as its a good discussion of the topic. I would, but - well, there are some emergency matters that require my attention. When I have more spare time, I will update wiki page. In the meantime, I left link to my message at discussion page. This way it should not be lost. If someone is willing to pick up challenge and update wiki, do not hesitate to. <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:QA/HowToBibisect> -- Best regards Mirosław Zalewski _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
