Hi Andras
Andras Timar-3 wrote > No, that's not the case. Tinderboxes are up and running and it was > never the responsibility of the SUSE staff to fix regressions reported > by Tinderboxes. I never said (or implied) it was their responsibility to fix those regressions :) I assumed that the Tinderboxes were a property of Suse and with this change in Suse's position they would no longer be available for compiling LO binaries (only some say "tdf-owned hardware" so the owner of e.g. #6 could be Suse). Tinderbox #39 manages to produce Windows binaries most days (even if they do not work in Windows XP) so it must be doing something right :) Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Why-no-daily-master-builds-tp4073881p4073919.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
