Hey Terrence, On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Terrence Enger <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 10:44 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > > I finally got around to updating the wiki: > > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard#Bibisect > > > > Let's not use all the other options now and stick with: > > > > bibisected > > PreBibisect > > bibisectrequest > > So, considering the possibility of updating wiki page HowToBibisect in > line with the reduction in the number of whiteboard values, I wonder: > > (*) The explanation of whiteboard status PreBibisect says > > Only use this f you are using the daily bibisect package or > the bibisect40 package, as the tagged version does not go back > as far. > > I suggest > > Only use this if you are using the 4.0 bibisect package or the > 3.5 bibisect package, as the tagged versions in the other > bibisect packages do not go back as far. > +1, sounds fine, although no one should be using 3.5 bibisect package any longer. The bibiect40 package contains everything in 3.5 so using 3.5 is outdated. I believe the wiki says something along these lines :) > > If the suggestion is not right, then my understanding of the > bibisect packages is in urgent need of correction. Help! > Hm looks like you get it :) > > (*) Should existing whiteboard words "bibisect40bugs", > "bibisect36bugs", and "bibisect35bugs" be changed to > "bibisectrequest"? Is it worth the flurry of emails and updated > date-last-changed fields? Only for open bugs, perhaps? > No, these mean that bibisect was done, not that it's requested. So the more appropriate would be "bibisected" but I don't think we should do this, at least not yet, with the NEEDINFO project going we're already sending a lot of spam to developers and users from FDO - sending even more seems like a bad idea atm. In the future this could be useful. Can you quickly get a query together that shows us approx. how many bugs we're talking about - I think focusing on non closed bugs would be ideal, why update whiteboard status on bugs that have been fixed? Best, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer [email protected]
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
