On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:45:36AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:21:31PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > > Apologies for my lack of technical skills, but...what does this mean > > exactly? In terms of QA being able to use it, is it ready? Almost > > ready? > > The stuff that I pushed would allow you to build the bibisect repo if you > would > understand how it is intended to be used -- which is the trouble, as it is > severelt underdocumented right now. > > > And for the bibisect repo, that would be up to most recent > > commit? > > The one I have sitting on my local disc? The last version it contains is > 4.0.0.0.beta1. It does not contain any master commits -- so e.g. you can see > were it broke between libreoffice-4-0-branch-point and the > libreoffice-3.6.4.3. > But it has all the microreleases e.g. 3.6.2.1, 3.6.2.2, 3.6.3.1 ... so you can > see if and where is broke _in_ one major release. So its a bibisect repo > without any of the intermediate steps on master, but with all released > versions > (including rcs and alpha/betas). > > Im packing what I have right now and will try to upload it today, I guess just > playing around with it might make it easier to see what I mean. ;)
I uploaded the tags repo as: http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/bibisect-4.0-tags1.tar.xz md5sum: e9e3119777cce4020b310dd99fef0458 its a bit bigger than usual as I did not repack it and it ends with 3.6 at 3.6.4 and 4.0 at beta1. Still, if you want to play with it, go ahead! ;) Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
