Robinson Tryon wrote > Oh, certainly. Perhaps Pedro meant that we shouldn't remove *all* of > the 3.3 builds from the picker, for this very reason. Rainer described > this as "not-release-3.3 [builds]". I think we're mostly in agreement > here :-)
Yes, exactly. I just read the title of Rainer other thread. I wrongly assumed he meant removing ALL 3.3 versions except for version LibO 3.3.0 Beta2. Apologies on the confusion. See my previous mail with suggestion on having two separate fields: one for the version reported (where the user observed it) and one for the first occurrence (determined by QA) Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Lifecycle-of-builds-tp4048583p4049069.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
