On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Cor Nouws <[email protected]> wrote: >> Remember that if an extension stops working, it's not the absentee >> developer who is inconvenienced, but the user who installed it with >> some expectations of reliability. > > What one can do now, is like/dislike. But that's a quite rough manner of > communicating.
Good point. Does one have to log-in to do that? > So my summary is that three things would be helpful here: > - general info on the extension website explaining who is responsible; > - contact information of the one providing the extension; > - a note somewhere on the LibreOffice QA site/wiki, that we can refer to if > an issue needs to be marked as NOTOURBUG, where there is clear and friendly > explanation. > > To me this seems the easiest way to handle the case, with responsibility > where it belongs, and the least hassle of maintaining extra structures / > procedures. > > Does that make sense? Yep. I think we're all getting on the same page here :-) --R _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
