Hi,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (04-03-13 23:58)
[new template dialog problems in 4.0.0]
thx for the look into that - as a first question (Cc QA list), is this
list triaged enough for hackers to start poking at high-prio issues?
I did quite some checking, rephrasing, and closing of dups. And
discussed when needed in the comments.
Did not take a close look at all prio's set.
Also I have few minor issues here, that I did not yet file.
And there are some issues related, in the sense that they are about
missing functionality that was in the old dialog. But I guess any hacker
looking at it will quickly link them.
So far for what I looked at it. I had a (global) discussion with two
contributors (qa/hacking) last Saturday too, that does not lead to
different view.
Still, I'm open for what others find of course, but the short answer
should be 'Yes' ;)
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- www.librelex.org
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
