Le 05/02/2013 13:03, Petr Mladek a écrit : All,
After suffering from the last two mass closure / re-initialisations of status of a fair number of bugs I had spent time in opening, but for lack of a dedicated developer / interest in those particular areas of LO at the time (OSX bugs, Base bugs) they never got any attention, I for one, will not be interested in this happening yet again. IMO, the rationale behind closing bugs in this way, i.e. "let's do it and if the user/reporter is really motivated he/she is bound to get back" sends completely the wrong message to the user community at large: - it assumes that casual users/reporters are heavily implicated in the project, or at least enough to defend their bug report tooth and nail; - that many of these bug reports are fallacious or fanciful. While some of them might well fall into the second category, I fear that many are from people who were incited to use the bug submission assistant after encountering a troublesome or even serious problem in their usage of the product and are then expected to get the "community fervour". The reality of this is that if you make a tool easily accessible for reporting bugs, then people simply expect that report to be followed up on by someone else, more knowledgeable. This doesn't mean that their bug report is any less worthy or relevant just because they don't then follow-up. To me, the solution being proposed is yet another high-handed way of "improving the stats" without due regard to those who made the effort in the first place to submit a report. Alex _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
