On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Florian Reisinger wrote: > On the other way HardHack nomination process and fixing rate is > quite good example that when you show which bugs should be fixed, > this could work and better the quality of the product. The time has > come to introduce this on a massive scale. I would propose to fight > dataloss and regressions first.
The reason why the HardHacks work is precisely because the are not done on a 'massive scale'. So: no, that is not an option at all. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
