I'm cleaning up and adding fixed hard hacks to the wiki and this mac one is annoying me :) I think we should have a policy that if the hard hack isn't accepted by a developer within 1 month, we should move it either a) back to proposed or b) to a new category of "need a volunteer, currently pending" or some other such status. I think the idea of hard hacks should be fast paced, where users can expect if the bug is on the list, it's going to get fixed. Otherwise it has the potential of sitting on the list for much too long and just cluttering an otherwise really stream lined process.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33302 Any thoughts? Regards, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibO QA Volunteer [email protected]
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
