On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Rainer Bielefeld < [email protected]> wrote:
> Olivier Hallot schrieb: > > > I am suggesting to CLOSE less than 15 bugs. >> > > > Hi Olivier, > > I suggest not to do that. The problem are not the few moments you invest > in closing. The problem is that this Status info will be worrying because > it's not in accordance with current habits; it might make queries less > reliable. > > Currently it's more or less common sense to proceed as following: > Status of a bug will be changed to RESOLVED FIXED (by the developer) if > the fix has been introduced into the most early Version where possible and > planned. With RESOLVED FIXED the work on that bug normally is terminated. > > RESOLVED FIXED may be changed to VERIFIED FIXED if someone did intensive > tests what proved that the bug is really fixed AND that no other problems > seem to be caused by the fix. Only a quick test "fix works" is not > sufficient. > > Sometimes Bugs become resolution CLOSED as a kind of exclamation mark with > the implicit statement "Work on this bug is definitively terminated, > discussion finished", if there were insecurities, objections, ... . For > example this might be appropriate if someone found out that although there > is a fix the problem still exists under particular circumstances. The > question was whether the fix is incomplete (or does not work), or whether > that is a new different bug only showing similar symptoms. CLOSED indicates > that the discussion has been terminated with the result that work on this > bug really has been terminated with the fix. > > I will write some more elaborated and precise notes at <https://wiki.** > documentfoundation.org/QA-FAQ <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA-FAQ>> > and recommend to discuss that on a ESC call (and may be on a QA call) if > there are concerns or objections. > > Everybody should follow the current habits or a decision of ESC to keep > queries reliable. > > I will keep you up to date here in this thread. > > Best regards > > Rainer > > Thanks Rainer, The above really makes more sense. -- -- Masekela Walls Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
