On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Joel Madero <[email protected]> wrote:
> These are just a few of the things that pertained to QA > > 1. Calc (3.6) crashing > 1. bugs discussed, we need to go through the Unconfirmed and > verify. The NEW ones are being looked at by the developers > 2. HardHacks > 1. Previous email sent out, we need to finalize the process > 2. Developers have gone through the hard hacks, a continuous list > is preferred (max of 5-7 bugs at a time, refilling these as they are > taken > care of is best > 3. See previous email for suggestions > 3. Triaging > 1. Begged for more help for back log ;), some interested but > suggestion of bug hunting session. Time difference could be an issue, > can > someone else in Europe try to arrange this? If it's over the weekend I > may > be able to join, otherwise very hard > 2. There are 30ish students from Hungary (I believe?) doing > development, asked for more EasyHacks to work on, I suggested that maybe > they could help triage and maybe find their own EasyHacks (not sure what > the result of this was) > 4. EasyHacks > 1. Like above, need more EasyHacks marked, people are available to > deal with them but there aren't enough out there > 2. My comment: I'm seeing things marked as EasyHack without the > entire list of things that we usually should put for easy hack > (particularly bt if possible, and some direction as to where to look in > the > code) > 5. MAB > 1. There really shouldn't be any put to 3.7 from what I understood > 6. Resolved Status > 1. Only mark as Resolved if it's resolved in latest stable, not if > it only works in latest master (a comment can be put in if it's working > on > latest master) > 2. WORKSFORME unless you know for sure the bug was assigned and > dealt with by a developer, in which case ask them to mark as RESOLVED - > FIXED or mark it yourself (again only if you're sure that it wasn't just > coincidentally fixed, or just works for you and you're not sure if the > particular bug was dealt with) > 7. Issues regarding rudeness on FDO > 1. Michael dealt with the one case, banning a user is probably more > problematic than it's worth. > 2. Creating a wiki page (Joel) to kind of address this, something > along the lines of "What is not useful in reporting a bug" > > I think that was about it, if I missed something, my apologies. > > > Best Regards, > Joel > > > I have a question about the old Bug ticket dating back to 2011. How long should we keep a ticket open if we are requesting additional information on the ticket. is it safe to resolved them to resolved>invalid ? -- -- Masekela Walls Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
