Petr Mladek píše v Po 03. 09. 2012 v 18:41 +0200:
> > > 4. Do 3.7.0-RCs every week (use the original schedule). There is not
> > > enough time for feedback => demotivating for QA.
>
> After all, this is still good solution. We released, 3.5 and 3.6 this
> way and it somehow worked. The .0 release is always hectic and we get
> many fixes every week, so the two weeks delay between rc2 and rc3 would
> be too long.
After all we used something close to this. The schedule is:
+ Week 2: 3.7.0-rc1
+ Week 3:
+ Week 4: 3.7.0-rc2
+ Week 5: 3.7.0-rc3
+ Week 6: 3.7.0-release
+ Week 7:
+ Week 8: 3.7.1-rc1
+ Week 9: 3.7.1-rc2
+ Week 10: 3.7.1-release
+ Week 11: 3.7.2-rc1
+ Week 12:
+ Week 13: 3.7.2-rc2
+ Week 14: 3.7.2-release
+ Week 15: 3.7.3-rc1
+ Week 16:
+ Week 17: 3.7.4-rc2
+ Week 18: 3.7.4-release
By other words, I moved 3.7.0-rc3 and 3.7.1.rc1 and created space
between them. It is not ideal but we will do it better in the future
releases.
See also https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
Best Regards,
Petr
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
