Hi Petr
Petr Mladek wrote > > I am sorry but I have to disagree that it is easy to understand. If you > see 3.6.0.00x without extra information, you have no idea that it is > potentially unstable alpha version. It could set wrong expectations and > bring bad feeling. > I agree with your comment. It is indeed safer that it is clearly visible that the *file* is a test version. And it is good that the file name is consistent with the version name in the About box. Best regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-New-Bugzilla-Version-Picker-items-2-tp3988411p3990068.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
