On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:57 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> I did a quick query concerning LibO Bugs with "somehow patch"
> attachments [1] and still UNFIXED, hat might show that these patches
> still wait for review or something else went wrong
>
> What shell we do with these 60 bugs?
Yep - so; I reviewed all the outstanding bugs with a 'patch' boolean
set to true/1 - and the majority are patches that were abhortive /
proof-of-concept / and shouldn't be merged. I guess I should prolly have
flagged them with some 'notpatch' keyword ;-) or adjusted them in some
way. I pushed the real ones to the mailing list and/or merged / closed
them.
The real trick is to push new patch bugs to the dev. list I think
and/or thoughts on how to annotate / improve the query appreciated.
I also didn't quest for patches that were not marked as such but files
ending '.diff' or '.patch' - perhaps there are some there (if there is
an easy-to-use query for me to review those that'd be great ;-).
Thanks,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
