Hi, On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:20:40AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > The problem here is that a single check box enables a group of unknown > features.
No, its not. If you need a stable product, the checkbox is not a option anyway as all its features are instable by definition. > Personally I would be more than happy to just enable macros and leave all > the other unknown features disabled. A feature is either stable enough to be included even with "experimental enabled" or it is not. If you care about macros, help out getting it stable enough to be moved out of "experimental" an into the general feature set. > Isn't this possible? No, as said: It is not worth is. We already have way too many test scenarios and creating even more will just delute and strain our ressources. Actually, the "experimental" switch isnt such a great idea IHMO, unless the stuff is driven to reach product stability quickly. To put it differently: Unless there are dedicated developers working on a selected 'experimental' features quickly reacting to QA output, we should not waste too much time on it, but instead focus on the core functionality. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
