Hi Drew, drew wrote (06-02-12 00:35)
Noticed on slashdot today that someone was complaining about LibreOffice not being willing to deal with their bug report because they had a document showing the defect (I looked at the issue and suspect it may actually be a duplicate BTW) and according to this individual he was told that there was no way for TDF/LibreOffice QA to handle such a document.
I do not read that the document was confidential, but guess that is what you mean.
I've been around the block enough times not to take this at face value necessarily, but I was wondering about it - I thought there had been some work done, procedure wise and even ML wise just for this type of situation. Anyway - I thought about responding to the person on slashdot but thought it best to touch base here first.
It's always possible to post a document to one of the devs (after having contact) so that it does not end in public archives.
Have done this myself more than once. Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
