Hi Cor, *,

On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Cor Nouws <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Wrt new bugs: we've seen 47 new bugs submitted.
> Query below (1)
>
> Would it be possible, cloph maybe, to have a list of the ones that joined on
> IRC. nicks, names, maybe country, if we know them, ...
> I did not yet look if submitted bugs were by new testers.

Well - a quick executive summary:
$ grep "has joined" /tmp/libreoffice.log  |awk '{print $4 "\t" $1
"]"}' |grep 2011-12-2[567] |awk '{print $1}' |sort |uniq |wc -l
168
$ grep "has joined" /tmp/libreoffice.log  |awk '{print $4 "\t" $1
"]"}' |grep 2011-12-2[56789] |awk '{print $1}' |sort |uniq |wc -l
320

So attendance was quite satisfying - about 150 additional people[1]
stepped by, nearly doubling the regular visitors (atm there are 98
people & bots in the channel)
i.e. on the days prior to the bughunt, from Sunday to Tuesday, 168
different nicks joined the channel, when the bughunt days (Wed & Thu)
we see an additional 152 nicks that did not show up on the previous
days.

So from this level: Surely a success :-)) The banner & announcements
did serve its purpose.

[1] that is the lower number - if from the regular visitors fewer did
join on wed&thu, then more new people did join instead, but you also
have to take "same person, different nick" into account (auto-joins
after connection drops and similar), so that number is a fair guess.

> I did not prepare any general 'thank you' wiki-page. Did had the idea, but
> slipped through. OTOH, it was my experience that people left mostly without
> notice in advance, so saying thanks via IRC just before leaving was
> difficult.
> I drafted a general 'thank you' message and send to our marketing list.

Yeah, this is OK - maybe we should have prepared a thank-you banner...

> I had the impression that quite some people took the opportunity to step in
> with user questions, not having the intention to help with the bug-hunt.

Yes, but that also isn't necessarily a bad thing. While the actual
intention of the bughunt (reveal severe bugs in 3.5.0beta2) might not
have been the actual focus, I'm satisfied with how busy the channel
was. (although it was much more quiet on Thursday)

> Furthermore the help of Cloph was great, IMO.

Oh, thank you for the flowers, although I myself didn't focus on the
3.5.0 hunt either (but rather took the opportunity to dig through
unconfirmed bugs) I tried my best to help out people asking questions
on the channel.

> What did I miss?

Scheduling a two-day event 24/7 basically was a major task - so kudos
for pushing it!
(although next time, we should make sure to have "fallback"-mentors available)

"Boring" wall-of-text data inline, as the list might strip all attachments:
List of "unique" visitors on bug-day (i.e. nicks that didn't show up
the three days before the bugdays) - I spot 12 nick-variants that are
clear duplicates at first sight from that list of 152 nicks. But
account for those that already joined on Tuesday, confusing the dates
and joining again on Thursday - doesn't really make that much of a
difference in this order of magnitude (and double-nicks of course also
happen in the previous days)
$ comm -3 regular.list all.list
        _0bitcount
        a0301241
        ajc
        Anastasia
        andres_
        AndroidLoverInSF
        anton_mei
        anton_meixome
        arist
        asa
        asdf_
        ashfall
        ashfall_
        asnoehu
        blauefuesse
        bugspray
        castermn
        castermn_
        chandoo
        chipotle
        ckoo
        CorNouws
        crm
        daf3707
        dalaen
        DawnFoster
        designbybeck
        dijonyummy
        donzoomik
        dragon_
        elix
        elixir007
        enoki
        enoki_
        enoki__
        enoki___
        enoki____
        eresus
        ertai_NL
        Fen1x
        ferite
        FernandoBasso
        filmsi
        fitoschido
        Fred_
        frob_tea
        fulka
        funkerhornsby
        gbpacheco
        GeraldG
        GeraldG_
        GeraldG__
        glin_
        gsymons
        gt106
        gt106_
        Guest17501
        Ha
        HaBart
        harish_
        hein_bloed
        helly
        hms
        Hot
        igustin
        imacat2
        interaction
        Jacek_
        j_b_m
        Jochen
        joehillen
        Jorendc
        jsharbb
        juanan
        kahu
        _KAMI_1
        Kano
        kingsley
        korrawit
        Ksa22
        kubanc
        kukac
        labinnsw
        LairdHeal
        lch8706
        lcv
        linuxvsmac
        ljh
        lmde_user
        lorenzo5930
        lukys_
        lvqing
        ManDay
        Marciov
        markit
        mars
        matus
        mirror176_
        misterbean
        mmeeks
        mnx
        moggi1
        munzir
        myEnglishIsPoor
        NEOhidra
        ngong_
        nickgreyink
        Octy
        oliver1804
        OlivierHallot
        OndraM
        Papamatti2
        patkoscsaba
        pppregin
        raulpacheco
        rdponticelli_
        rfv
        rumianom
        satul
        SavageSimian
        seku
        sgasgar
        shankarprasad
        smaug42__
        sophi
        sophi1
        Stefan_W
        stelt
        stephan
        stephan_
        Taolin
        temp123
        Teppo123
        tesstevegadd123_
        The_Ball
        timar
        todventtu
        Turl
        UnconventionalT
        v_2e
        vedran
        veki
        vista2012
        WanderFound
        wish
        xrfang
        yakuza
        yakuza_
        yqs09
        zaker
        zhanshime
        zvonimir

creating a by-country overview is rather tricky, as the hostmask would
have been translated to country.. So while somewhat possible, I'll
only look into it when asked again :-))
ciao
Christian
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to