Hi *, On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Michael Meeks <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 16:50 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: >> Just tried to install the daily build from 2011-11-02 on my Ubuntu: >> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux_x86_Release_Configuration/master/2011-11-05_01.05.12/ > > As this keeps coming back, I was amazed to read: > >> I install the builds in parallel: >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
To install the dev-snapshots, those that are labeled as LibO-Dev-…, there is no need to go into the manual extraction procedure. The LibO-Dev buidls will install alongside the stable versions, without interfering with each other. That's the whole point of that branding. (i.e. using both different installation directories and also a different user-profile directory) You only need to go through manual unpacking or rebasing procedures when trying to install different versions of the same "flavor", i.e. when installing multiple LibO-Dev builds or when you want to have 3.4.2 alongside 3.4.3 > It looks (potentially) highly problematic. I suggest we add a big > health warning to it. > > It would (perhaps) be easier to change the install prefix and/or > installname for our tinderbox builds. I wonder if there is an easy way > to do that (Fridrich?) so we could just install the packages as-is. This is already the case. Again the whole point of the LibO-Dev branding/variant. ciao Christian _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
