Sophie Gautier píše v Čt 03. 11. 2011 v 21:30 +0100: > As you know Litmus was only a default choice because we didn't find > anything better that could fit our needs. There is a new tool > developed by the Mozilla Foundation, but it won't be available before > some time from what I know. However, Rimas and Yi Fan have managed to > make it more comfortable and it's what we use for now.
I am very happy that we have Litmus and I really appreciate the work! I am just slightly nervous that we have only few test cases. Also I am not sure if we do test runs regularly... There must be many people around that would want to help with testing. Every localization team team had its own testers. We need to encourage them. I think that the feature freeze for 3.5 release will be good point to get attention. I wonder if we could make it easier with few more changes. > The best way for the moment, would be to add the tests on the wiki and > and admin to add them to Litmus. I know it's less easy and open than > we would like however. Yes, it might be a good workaround if the transition works reasonable fast. We could create admins from people that contribute many good test cases. So, it might balance the load on admins. Alternatively, people might send test cases to the libreoffice-qa mailing list and add [TESTCASE] into the subject. It would work the same way like [PATCH] on the developer mailing list. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
