https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157350
--- Comment #21 from Jambunathan K <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #20) > I can reproduce the problem. Thanks for re-opening the issue. The examples I have given are the simplest, in the sense that their hand-rolled, and has very bare essentials. Futhermore, my use-case is unique. The converter I am using--rather the one I am authoring and maintaining--doesn't use SDKs and relies on what XML LO already generates and improvises on it for simplicity. >From the "Standard Compliance" case perspective, the independently rolled converter tests the LO in unique ways. Having the issue open, ensures that my test case is available for someone to validate against. (Closing the issue means that my test case would remain lost in the haystack) IOW, keep the issue open not for the FR its making but for supplying a unique test case. Also I have been working on my Emacs-lisp based converter close to a decade, and I have personally felt that the Writer was seriously lacking in table cell style department, and ... I sensed that there is some momentum in getting Table Template and Table Cell styles formally blessed, and I wanted to make hay while the sun was shining. > The wish here is to have true table styles. Currently it works only as > template when generating a table or re-applying a template. When the > template is assigned, this generates direct formatting of table, column, row > and cells. > > An intermediate solution could perhaps be to generate these direct > formatting from the template when opening a file and overwrite its settings > in case there exists already direct formatting in the file. > > I thought we have already a report about true table styles, but cannot find > it. Are you thinking of [Bug 34391 - FORMATTING: Introduce table cell styles (edit) ](https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34391) which has the following remark [Changing enhancement priority to 'high' since the number of people in CC is higher than 20](https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34391#c28) May be that bug will help you dig in to better reports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
