https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154788
--- Comment #25 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #22) > Sane proportional fonts have monospaced digits. ... which is not what ady talked about - the phrase was that "the width for digits is not the same as some *other set of characters*". (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #23) > Well, Times New Roman and its brother, Liberation Serif, are not part of > that sane group... and that's the case also for Arial and Liberation Sans. Huh? These fonts do have the same width for digits. > I vaguely recall LO phasing them out in favor of Carlito and Caladea, but that > doesn't seem to have happened very earnestly. LO? TNR and friends are MS fonts, and Carlito at al are a metric-compatible substitutes for a *different* set of MS fonts. LO is not in a position to phase fonts out from users' documents, it can only provide descent substitutions (which it does, both for older and for newer MS fonts). [/OT] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
