https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43157
--- Comment #122 from Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #121) > E.g., there's lots of 'OSL_ENSURE(false, ...)' stuff in things like catch > clauses; I don't see how replacing those could be non-trivial. What's non-trivial there per se? How to tell, without intimate knowledge of the code, whether that catch clause can legitimately be reached (and the OSL_ENSURE should be replaced with SAL_WARN or SAL_INFO) or not (and the OSL_ENSURE should be replace with assert or O3TL_UNREACHABLE)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
