https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143051
--- Comment #5 from NISZ LibreOffice Team <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #3) > According to > https://help.libreoffice.org/7.3/en-GB/text/shared/01/02230100. > html?&DbPAR=WRITER&System=WIN turning on/off bulleted & numbered list is not > part of change record We should add insert/delete images to that page, since bug #59463 is fixed :). But yeah this is an enhancement request, since the Normal Office can do this, so we should be too. (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > Reported by yourself in bug 115523. No, this one is about recording turning on/off on an existing paragraph, while that other is about previewing the result of a paragraph deletion in numbering (and 115524 is about previewing the result of a paragraph insertion into a list). The general problem is that barely any function in the bullets&numbering toolbar generates a change tracking entry - unlike the Normal Office does. I have some canned bugs that wait only for a bit of time to upload them, and those cover pretty much all those toolbar commands. > > (Having several META tickets for missing TC features makes no sense to me.) My work hypothesis is that cutting up meta bugs into small (< 10-20 bug) mini-metas is more useful to oversee where we are regarding properly implementing a feature (by reducing the scope of features), compared to mega-size meta bugs like bug 75057 or bug 104444 or even bug 83946. This complements cutting up generic "nothing works, everything is bad" type complaints like bug 33082 into small, actionable edit/import/export bugs about well defined menu commands/object attributes, by wrangling together these feature-based bugs under the way broader meta topics. I may be wrong though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
