https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134203
Jan-Marek Glogowski <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 | |1556 Keywords|bibisected, bisected | --- Comment #8 from Jan-Marek Glogowski <[email protected]> --- FYI: the bibisect commit was reverted to fix bug 141556 in https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/0fedac18214a6025401c4c426466a5166553e8ec%5E%21 I tried to find an alternative fix (dropping quite some code), but everything I came up with resulted in broken layout: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/114105 Main problem is that I simply don't understand the condition, when it's actually fine to break the layout, so it can be resumed correctly. 2nd problem is, that the idle layout is currently stateless, but for my current approach it would need some state to handle removing of pages. So I'm removing the bibisect* keywords; maybe it can be bibisected again hoping for a better result. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
