https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134165
--- Comment #8 from Luke Kendall <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #7)
> (In reply to Luke Kendall from comment #6)
> > My preference, because it would be useful to be able to edit a field, would
> > be to make the bug an enhancement (to provide the implied functionality).
>
> I guess renaming is prevented in order to protect the user from making
> mistakes, shooting themselves in the foot. Let's ask UX what they think.
>
> There is bug 111888 for a variable UX overhaul
I'm not sure in what way it could lead to causing the user to create errors,
but even if there were, I'd hope the function could either:
1) check and adjust to use the new edited value wherever it was previously
used, or
2) offer to create a new field with the new properties.
In either case, if there's only a single use, I suspect no errors could be
caused.
But you would all know better than me about the consequences and effects.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
