https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141319
--- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2)
> If
> the number of glyphs defined does not fill the collapsed packing of the
> chart--why not use the undefined glyph for the respective font to fill the
> remained of the chart?
I don't see how rendering a "undefined" glyph fits "no data in this place"?
"Undefined" is for "there is a code point here, but no glyph". The problem in
this bug is "show that there's no code point here".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
