https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168796
--- Comment #11 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10) Let me rephrase. I mean, given the intended width (standard width?) and number of items of a dialog, why is it legitimate to use icons so large that they would exceed the width? Or are you saying that its the height-filling that dictates the square icon dimensions, and we are expanding the width to adapt? Because I'm not so sure that's a great idea. Would users really appreciate, say, a dialog with three or four huge icons that monopolize your attention? And if the icons are not that huge - do they really not fit the widths we (or you) have set for the tab navigation rectangle? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
