https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169163
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Becker <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #1) > cloph, LibreOffice always uses hardcoded internal Python version for every > LO version, right? Well, besides --enable-python=internal/fully-internal --enable-python=system also exists. > (and I'm not sure we should allow to build LO with external Python that can > be newer, for example, than our harcoded version) And to quote a comment from configure, with a bit of highlighting from myself: # ===================================================================== # Checking for a Python interpreter with version >= 3.3 (or 3.7 if the build needs meson) # Optionally user can pass an option to configure, i. e. --> # ./configure PYTHON=/usr/bin/python <--- # ===================================================================== Of course things can changes, but the intention seems pretty clear. FWIW, I can make it work with one sed invocation sed -e "/unset PYTHON am_cv_pathless_PYTHON /d" But I'm a bit too confused or uninformed about how many times python is searched for in configure to turn that into a proper patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
