https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168203
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- Think there is a distinction to be made between those vertical tab (VT) dialogs with "dense" counts of items like Paragraph compared to VT dialogs with more vertical space and fewer items like Tables--some threshold of visible button counts and vertical space that controls label placement and icon size. The UI does not suffer from this inconsistency so long as it is maintained across the VT dialogs. Actually this is no different than previous Tab layouts where we split the UI into rows of tabs. More dense dialogs getting additional rows to hold and shifting the active rows. Addition of Icons now for each tab control in the vertical oriented column is fine. And so probably is allowing the icon size to respond to density of the dialog. bug 167862 was opened against VT < 4 controls, so guess we actually have three flavors of VT to consider. Would UI be improved by limiting all the VT dialogs to like sized icon assignments for "consistency"? I don't think it would matter, but we would not want the size of the dialog adjust to the density of tabs. The additional vertical space for low density VT dialogs needs to be accommodated. So allowing the size of the icon and the positioning of the label text to respond is probably the better response. IMHO => NAB -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
