https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165122
--- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- IMO, this asks for something that, while may seem reasonable, should not be implemented. "Apply" does the change to the configuration. The very first "Apply" already made a change that, to become active, needs a restart. Then another "Apply" (with the same side effects) arrived. To know that the two applications cancelled each other, we need to keep track of the history; to know what the side effects could be *after* the restart; to take into account, that the *change* of installing the new themes didn't modify the restart side effects. IMO, this needs too broad knowledge in the dialog machinery. It needs assumptions, intelligence, that is simply unreasonable in it. The current behavior is simple and robust. Implementing the proposal would need huge increase in complexity, which would marginally improve some corner use case, but hugely increase fragility of the system. WF IMO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
