https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161820
Linus Drumbler <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #195023|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from Linus Drumbler <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 196918 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=196918&action=edit Document with the font corrected to Zilla Slab:lnum Here is the same document with the font corrected to Zilla Slab:lnum. That was my mistake. You can clearly see the problem on the centre diagonal with entries like 10,10 and 3,3. The figures there are the old-style variants, with 1234579 going below the baseline and 6/8 going above it. Whereas if you type an alphabetical character in the cell, the numbers realize that they should be their lining variants and snap back to full height. If you type just a number in a cell, it's the oldstyle variant. But I've specified via the OpenType font features that it should use the lining variant. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
