2018-02-28 11:19 GMT+01:00 Genghuang Wang <[email protected]>: > Hello > > I have found it which claims to be "source code" of the FFmpeg at > http://dldir1.qq.com/weixin/android/FFmpegJNI.zip in > http://www.wechat.com/en/source_code.html . > > After unzip it, I have found some static library in the path of > \FFmpegJNI\FFmpegJNI\jni\ffmpeg\android\arm\lib\libavcodec.a ,and some > other static libraries which are also part of Libav released under > LGPL > > According to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic > > Does the LGPL have different requirements for statically vs > dynamically linked modules with a covered work? (#LGPLStaticVsDynamic) > For the purpose of complying with the LGPL (any extant version: v2, v2.1 or > v3): > > (1) If you statically link against an LGPL'd library, you must also > provide your application in an object (not necessarily source) format, > so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and relink > the application. > > So the application statically link to libavcodec and some other LGPL > libraries by FFmpeg, without releasing itself in an object format to > allow relinking. If that is the case, maybe the application is > breaking the license of LGPL which the FFmpeg releases in?
Many applications violate the copyright of FFmpeg developers, it is very hard / impossible to do something against them. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
