On Dec 08, 2012, at 19:55, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:

> Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos@...> writes:
> 
>>> You may not agree, but it my experience that material 
>>> that has already been compressed with a lossy codec is
>>> often hard to compress further
>> 
>> This is true for material that has been compressed with 
>> maximum quantiser but this does not seem like a typical 
>> use-case to me.
> 
> And you can of course further compress such material by 
> using some of the picture processing abilities that 
> FFmpeg offers...
> 
Possibly, but that's not the point here, nor necessary. Maybe for those 
recordings that approach the maximum size (4Gb), but in that case there'd also 
be the issue of the transcoding duration. Given the (mediocre) image quality 
I'd be more interested in an approach without transcoding, but that turns out 
not to be feasible for playback using the existing QuickTime-based player on 
win32. It really surprised me that some of the code path could be that badly 
optimised, but that isn't the point here either :)

> (I don't think -vcodec mjpeg supports setting a bitrate, sorry 
> I did not really consider this.)

It clearly doesn't support it as expected, but the option does have an effect. 
Fortunately ...

I don't know if you're the one to suggest this too, but I really feel something 
like a -b:v auto or -b:v copy is missing (but maybe you'll tell me that it 
doesn't make sense to transcode while maintaining the original bit rate?)

René

_______________________________________________
Libav-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user

Reply via email to