Tim Cannell <tim@...> writes: > Thanks for you reply - I guess my remaining doubt lies in > the fact that previously libfaac was incorrectly claimed > to be LGPL when in fact it incorporates code from an > external source that is not available under this licence.
(Since it is not completely clear to me if you know this:) The FFmpeg developers were the ones who found out that faac can indeed not be distributed under the LGPL... [...] > I wanted to be sure the internal ffmpeg aac encoder > implementation did not fall into the same category, but > after limited research still have some lingering doubts... What research supported this doubts? Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ Libav-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
