Le 30/03/2018 à 10:46, Diego Biurrun a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 09:36:05AM +0200, Steve Lhomme wrote:
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -1708,6 +1708,7 @@ SYSTEM_LIBRARIES="
      vaapi_x11
      vdpau_x11
+    bcrypt
      wincrypt
  "
This should be ordered.

@@ -2611,7 +2612,7 @@ avdevice_extralibs="libm_extralibs"
  avfilter_extralibs="pthreads_extralibs libm_extralibs"
  avresample_extralibs="libm_extralibs"
-avutil_extralibs="clock_gettime_extralibs cuda_extralibs cuvid_extralibs 
d3d11va_extralibs libm_extralibs libmfx_extralibs nanosleep_extralibs pthreads_extralibs 
user32_extralibs vaapi_extralibs vaapi_drm_extralibs vaapi_x11_extralibs 
vdpau_x11_extralibs wincrypt_extralibs"
+avutil_extralibs="clock_gettime_extralibs cuda_extralibs cuvid_extralibs 
d3d11va_extralibs libm_extralibs libmfx_extralibs nanosleep_extralibs pthreads_extralibs 
user32_extralibs vaapi_extralibs vaapi_drm_extralibs vaapi_x11_extralibs 
vdpau_x11_extralibs bcrypt_extralibs wincrypt_extralibs"
same

@@ -4581,6 +4582,7 @@ check_lib ole32    "windows.h"            CoTaskMemFree   
     -lole32
  check_lib shell32  "windows.h shellapi.h" CommandLineToArgvW   -lshell32
  check_lib wincrypt "windows.h wincrypt.h" CryptGenRandom       -ladvapi32
  check_lib psapi    "windows.h psapi.h"    GetProcessMemoryInfo -lpsapi
+check_cpp_condition Vista+ windows.h "_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0600" && check_lib bcrypt 
"windows.h bcrypt.h" BCryptGenRandom  -lbcrypt
Do you really need to check the Vista condition? What about using bcrypt

Yes, you need to use it only on builds that won't run on XP. Otherwise it will fail to load the bcrypt.dll and the whole libavutil DLL (or whatever its form) will fail to load. It would be possible to do it dynamically but IMO it's overkill. It's not really a critical component. But with time if XP support is dropped this check can go and wincrypt dropped entirely.

unconditionally if available? The variable name with an uppercase letter
and a '+' is slightly odd. I'm not sure if it can cause problems but I
cannot rule it out offhand either.

It seems the same is only used in config.log. And the + didn't cause any problem for me.


Diego
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to