On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 02:32:48PM +0000, Mark Thompson wrote: > On 03/02/18 17:23, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:59:02PM +0000, Mironov, Mikhail wrote: > >>> On 1/3/2018 7:53 PM, Sean McGovern wrote: > >>>> 2 things: > >>>> > >>>> - does this actually depend on dlopen directly, or should it be libdl, > >>>> like the entries below it? > >>> > >>> If this is Windows only as the doxy states, then LoadLibrary should be the > >>> only dep. But otherwise you're right, it should be libdl and not dlopen. > >> > >> We plan to add Linux support so eventually libdl will be needed. For now I > >> am OK with either solution. > > > > If this is Windows-only (for now at least), then there is no need for all > > the > > ifdeffery. We can add complexity if and when it is needed, no need to > > clutter > > the code for an uncertain and possibly distant future. > > On 04/02/18 14:08, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > Do we have coverage for this on FATE? > > This is why the vestigial libdl etc. support is useful - given the headers on > Linux, it's just another external library you can build anywhere.
OK, I'll look into adding it to my external libs FATE/Oracle instances. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
