On 2017/8/1 3:22, Maxym Dmytrychenko wrote:
LGTM, seems to be working just fine
Performance will be significantly reduced
if there are performance numbers showing this statement - would be good to
share it.
The performance comparison between the cascade mode and union mode is blew:
As the Libav now only has scale_qsv /interlace_qsv two qsv filters and
the deinterlace module still has some bug.
So we use our common filter module to simulate. Though the code is
different but the result is nearly the same(once we
make the validation on our patches that
framerate/denoise/deinterlace/detail/scale filter module are independent).
There are only three filters in the test case but the performance has
significantly reduced. The more filters in the cascade system
the more drop on the performance compared with the union mode.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote:
On 31/07/2017 03:27, Huang, Zhengxu wrote:
Looks good after a first read, I still need to try it.
Thank you a lot :)
lu
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
