On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:19:02 +0100
Mark Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:

> If -hwaccel foo is supplied without any other device options, and the
> foo hwaccel is meant to have a device, try to make such a device with
> default parameters for the hwaccel to use.
> ---
> This was intended to be the behaviour all along, but, as noted by wm4, the 
> implementation wasn't actually there.
> 
> The return value is not checked, because we only care about the dev argument 
> which is set on success.
> 
> 
>  avtools/avconv_hw.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/avtools/avconv_hw.c b/avtools/avconv_hw.c
> index fd1618389..94be72330 100644
> --- a/avtools/avconv_hw.c
> +++ b/avtools/avconv_hw.c
> @@ -287,6 +287,10 @@ int hw_device_setup_for_decode(InputStream *ist)
>              type = hw_device_match_type_in_name(ist->dec->name);
>          if (type != AV_HWDEVICE_TYPE_NONE) {
>              dev = hw_device_get_by_type(type);
> +            if (!dev) {
> +                hw_device_init_from_string(av_hwdevice_get_type_name(type),
> +                                           &dev);
> +            }
>          } else {
>              // No device required.
>              return 0;

I think I've also tested this one confirmed working on Friday.
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to