On 22/03/2017 23:51, Mark Thompson wrote: > Before this, output bitstream filters would never see EOF and > therefore would not be able to flush any delayed packets. > --- > 14:05 #libav-devel: <@elenril> jkqxz: the new flow in the bsf flush patch > feels weird to me > 14:06 #libav-devel: <@elenril> woudln't it be more natural to propagate EOFs > from one filter to the next as the happen, instead of flushing each one > separately? > > Different approach doing that. Preferable? > > > avtools/avconv.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >
I like it better, passing NULL directly to output_packet() might be slightly cleaner. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
