On 20/02/2017 23:40, Martin Storsjö wrote: > Yes, sure. If you want to, you could just flip that over and have the > tcp socket first in the list of polled fds as well. Having several poll > loops is worse IMO, I'd rather have one single blocking poll than > multiple ones polling this and that all over the place. Understood.
> In any case; this patch is not ok as is. Agreed. > Defer it until you're done to > post the rest of it; then it might be easier to see if this tradeoff is > ok to achieve something else. I hope to be done with that part soon. lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
