On 18/04/15 23:52, Timothy Gu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:18 AM Luca Barbato <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 14/04/15 22:05, Timothy Gu wrote: >>> No. >>> >>> Consider three tests, the first one succeeds without any output, the >> second >>> one outputs some debug information, and the third fails. >>> >>> Before: >>> >>> test1:0:: >>> test2:0:adsfasdfdsafdsafdsFADFadsf==: >>> test3:-2:asfasfwer34fsdadf:adsfrqwfdsaadsf >>> >>> After: >>> >>> test1:0:: >>> test2:0:: >>> test3:-2:asfasfwer34fsdadf:adsfrqwfdsaadsf >>> >> >> If the parsed value is just the 0 and the rest is ignored sounds quite a >> good idea. >> > > Yes the rest is ignored when status == 0. > > >> >> Thanks a lot! >> > > I don't think this was applied. Is there anything else I could do?
I gave Diego enough time to say something, I'll merge it today. (I have no time to progress further with [plaid](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/239012/6870361/d64ff22c-d49b-11e4-939d-aa634aefeeb0.png), even if it looks already [interesting](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/239012/6870358/d646438a-d49b-11e4-91f6-6e2c2c758ad0.png)) lu _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
